Why have I been charged with a number of offenses?
Get the answer here »
What should you do if you are stopped for drunk driving in Minnesota?
Get the answer here »
How can I get a limited license or "Work Permit"?
Get the answer here »
What should you do if you are arrested for drunk driving in Minnesota?
Get the answer here »
What is the difference between "DWI" and "DUI"?
Get the answer here »
When am I elibigle for a limited license?
Get the answer here »
When does Miranda apply? Or, "The police did not read me my rights!"
Get the answer here »
How can I challenge the revocation of my license?
Get the answer here »
What are the criminal penalties for "driving while impaired"?
Get the answer here »
How do you determine your blood alcohol concentration level?
Get the answer here »
Is my vehicle subject to forfeiture?
Get the answer here »
Why should I fight my arrest, license revocation and/or forfeiture?
Get the answer here »
Should I refuse to submit to chemical testing?
Get the answer here »
What is the Status of the Minnesota Intoxilyzer Source Code Litigation?
Get the answer here »
Why should I hire F.T. Sessoms as my Minnesota DWI lawyer?
Get the answer here »
Why Should I hire F.T. Sessoms as my Minnesota DWI lawyer?
Get the answer here »
840 TriTech Office Center • 331 Second Avenue South • Minneapolis, MN • (612) 344-1505
If you have been arrested for a DWI in Minnesota you are facing the immediate loss of your license, a criminal record, a jail term and thousands of dollars in increased insurance costs. But these cases can be won. I have successfully defended DWI arrests in Minnesota on all of the following grounds:
(a) Whether the police had sufficient grounds to make the initial stop of the vehicle;
(b) Whether the police had probable cause to make the arrest for DWI;
(c) Whether the police made a mistake of law;
(d) Whether the individual under arrest for DWI was properly advised of his rights pursuant to the Minnesota Implied Consent law:
(e) Whether the police assisted in the vindication of the right to counsel prior to testing or whether the right was arbitrarily terminated by the police;
(f) Whether the alcohol concentration test result was accurate and reliable;
(g) Whether the state made a timely disclosure of the "source code" (aka the system software) for the intoxilyzer 5000 breath testing machine, and;
(h) Whether the right to additional testing was hindered or denied by the police.